Skip to content

Paul Porvaznik – Business Litigator

Case Notes and Summaries of Recent Cases (State and Federal Courts – Illinois Focus)

Tag Archives: RPC 1.5

Missing Contingent-Fee Term Doesn’t Doom Law Firm’s Quantum Meruit Claim

Reversing a trial court’s dismissal of a law firm’s quasi-contract claims against a former client, the First District recently considered the enforceability of a contingency fee contract that was missing a material term. The plaintiff law firm in Seiden Law Group, P.C. v. Segal, 2021 IL App (1st) 200877 sued the defendant, an ex-client, for …

Continue reading “Missing Contingent-Fee Term Doesn’t Doom Law Firm’s Quantum Meruit Claim”

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Posted byPaulPDecember 17, 2021December 18, 2021Posted inReal estate litigationTags: attorneys' fees, contingency fee, enforceability, litigation, public policy, quantum meruit, RPC 1.5, unjust enrichment
Paul Porvaznik – Business Litigator, Proudly powered by WordPress.