Skip to content

Paul Porvaznik – Business Litigator

Case Notes and Summaries of Recent Cases (State and Federal Courts – Illinois Focus)

  • My Bio
    • Practice Areas
    • Presentations/Projects
    • Published Content (Print and Electronic Media)
  • Contact Me
  • Expert Witness Services, Freelance Writing Queries

Disclaimer

The content of this blog is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended to solicit business or to provide legal advice. Laws differ by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to every reader. You should not take, or refrain from taking, any legal action based upon the information contained on this blog without first seeking professional counsel.

Account Stated and Course of Dealing: Illinois Law

account_statementSTOPS Enterprises, LLC v. United Medical Equipment Co., 2014 WL 2699723 (N.D. IL 2014), examines how the parties’ course of dealing defines an oral contract and analyzes the account stated remedy in a case involving unpaid invoices for medical transportation services.

Under a series of oral agreements, plaintiff would pick up and give rides to the defendant’s clients in exchange for the defendant paying the plaintiff its transportation and wait time rates.

Over a three-year period, defendant fell behind in its payments and plaintiff sued to recover about $185,000 in unpaid invoices.  The court granted the plaintiff summary judgment on its breach of contract and account stated counts.

Result: Affirmed.

Reasoning:

There was no factual dispute that the plaintiff established defendant’s breach of an oral contract.  In the oral contract setting, the parties course of dealing or course of performance gives content to the specifics of an agreement.

The defendant argued that the plaintiff’s damage claim for “wait time charges” (about $30,000 of the claimed damages) should be stricken since there was no meeting of the minds on this point.  The court quickly rejected this argument; noting that the parties course of performance – shown by three years of plaintiff charging and defendant paying wait time charges – clearly established that these charges were a material and agreed term of the parties’ oral contract.  (*5-6).

The Court also held that even if there was no express contract, the plaintiff established an account stated.  In Illinois, an account stated is a determination of the amount of an existing debt combined with a tacit promise to pay that debt. 

When a plaintiff issues a statement of account to a defendant and the defendant retains the statement without objection within a reasonable amount of time, the law deems this as the defendant’s acknowledgement of the validity of the statement’s accuracy.

 The court will infer a meeting of the minds (as to the amounts owed) from the defendant’s failure to object to a statement of account within a reasonable time.  (*7).

Here, the plaintiff sent multiple e-mails requesting payment from defendant and the defendant sent numerous return e-mails acknowledging and promising to pay the debt.

The defendant also never objected to the plaintiff’s invoices and made partial payments to them over a several-month period.  The court found that by its actions, the defendant conceded the validity of plaintiff’s invoices.

The court further observed that for almost three years before its default, the defendant regularly paid plaintiff’s invoices without incident. (*8).

The Court granted plaintiff’s claim for nearly $14,000 in prejudgment interest.  Section 2 of the Illinois Interest Act (815 ILCS 205/2) allows a creditor to recover prejudgment interest at the rate of 5% on “instruments of writing.”  The party claiming interest must show that the money amount owed is an easily calculable (“liquidated”) amount or easy computable.

Illinois case law specifically includes unpaid invoices within the instruments of writing definition.  Because of this, the Court allowed the plaintiff to recover interest on the unpaid invoices measured from 30 days after the plaintiff stopped providing ride services to the defendant. (*10).

Take-aways:

(1) the parties’ course of performance provides evidence of oral contract terms; (2) a failure to dispute  invoices can lead to an account stated; (3) FRE 408 will not bar statements or admissions if they were made before an actual dispute formed; (4) pre-judgment interest will apply to an oral contract.

As long as there are unpaid invoices or other documents to show a readily computable sum, a plaintiff can tack on annual interest of 5% to the judgment amount and to his damage claim.

Share this:

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Published by

PaulP

Litigation attorney at Bielski Chapman, Ltd. representing businesses and individuals in business litigation, post-judgment enforcement, collections and real estate litigation. View all posts by PaulP

Posted on July 4, 2014October 3, 2018Author PaulPCategories Contract Law, RemediesTags account stated, accounts receivable, course of dealing, course of performance, implied contract, oral contract, prejudgment interest, statement of account, unpaid invoices

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Pawn Broker Wins Priority Dispute Against Creditor Involving Debtor’s Harley Davidson Motorcycle
Next Next post: No Fiduciary Duty Owed Lender By Closing Agent in Botched Real Estate Deal
Proudly powered by WordPress