Part II – 5.5.14 12:14 p.m. In Vincent v. Chuhak & Tecson 2014 WL 1612697 (N.D.Ill. 2014) the Court denied the Firm’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ FDCPA claims because it was at least plausible that the Firm’s demand letter was confusing and contradictory to the “unsophisticated consumer.” All that’s required for a plaintiff to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) …