In Instant Technology, LLC v. DeFazio, 2014 WL 1759184, the Northern District of Illinois examines Illinois non-compete law, trade secrets rules and a slew of business torts in the context of a heated battle between rival recruiting firms and some of their key employees. This article distills the case’s key restrictive covenant principles. Part II of …
Tag Archives: Fifield
The Fifield Case: Two Years of Continuous Employment = Sufficient Consideration to Enforce Restrictive Covenants
In Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc. 2013 IL App (1st) 120327, http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2013/1stDistrict/1120327.pdf the Court squarely held that two years of continued employment is required to uphold a noncompetition or nonsolicitation provision. Facts and Procedural History Plaintiff resigned about three months after starting his job as an insurance salesman and went to work for a competing firm. He …