Release and Satisfaction of Judgment and Guaranty Liability – IL Law

Brahos v. Chickerneo,  2014 IL App (2d) 130543-U, examines Illinois money damages rules, the extent of a guarantor’s liability and satisfaction-of-judgment requirements against the backdrop of a business dispute involving a failed car dealership. The plaintiff got a multi-million dollar fraud judgment against multiple defendants that stemmed from a failed car dealership business venture.  In post-judgment proceedings, the dealership was sold and the …

Settlement Agreement Construed Like Any Other Contract

  This one naturally resonated with me as I’ve experienced how time-consuming and expensive it is to monitor and enforce a settlement agreement that, in theory, ended the case. In Sprint Nextel v. AU Electronics, Inc., 2014 WL 2580, the parties executed a written settlement agreement ending litigation involving defendants’ illegal sale of Sprint cell phones.  The agreement required …

Franchisor’s Financial Projections Don’t Equal Fraud – Ill. Law

In many fraud cases, defendants reflexively assert some variant of the “forward looking” or “promissory” fraud defense: that the misstatement relates to a future event and is therefore a non-actionable statement of opinion. Illinois fraud rules require a misrepresentation to be material and present-tense factual  to be actionable.  Statements of future intent – like a forecast or projection (“this company is gonna make …